ملخص البحث :
In this study, a new multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework was designed and adopted for assessing the sustainability
of solid waste
treatment
techniques
(six treatment
techniques)
in urban areas
of Baghdad (the
capital
of Iraq).
A
questionnaire
has been developed
that
contains
the
four
dimensions of sustainability
(environmental,
economic, social, and
technical)
and their
indicators.
These indicators
have
been studied,
analyzed,
and evaluated
by
a group
of specialists
working
on solid waste
management.
Then the
data
were
modelled adopting
the
weighted
sum model (WSM),
weighted
product
model
(WPM) and technique
for
order
preference
by
similarity
to
ideal solution (TOPSIS).
The main results
of the
study
clearly
showed
that
the
sustainability
of municipal solid waste
treatment
in the
city of Baghdad is directly
related
to
the
four
dimensions
in variable
proportions
(weights),
and the
environmental
dimension gained
the
largest
impact
(46.9%) while the
technical
dimension gained
the
least
impact
(16.1%) on sustainability.
By analyzing
the
questionnaire
data
according
to
the
designed
framework
with
reference
to
the
three
methods
of MCDA
(WSM,
WPM, and TOPSIS)
and in the
presence
of three
Scenarios
of
the
multi-criteria
weights,
Recycling
by
Source-Separation
(RSS) Technique
gained
the
highest
score
(0.896)
which
means that
it is the
best
alternative,
while Anaerobic
Digestion
Technique
(AD) gained
the
lowest
score
(0.397) which
means
that
it is the
worst
alternative,
other
scores
are
(0.874) for
material
recycling
facility
(MRF) Technique,
(0.84) for
Landill
Technique,
(0.813)
for
Composting
Technique,
and
(0.584)
for
mass-burn
incineration
(MBI)
Technique.
-
سنة النشر : 2022
-
تصنيف البحث : clarivate
- تحميل