ملخص البحث :
In this study, four types of flood routing approaches were studied which give
significantly varied results represented by the differences between computed and observed flows
and also differ considerably on the friction coefficient and bed slope of the channels. First two
approaches use a hydraulic solution to solve the equations of unsteady flow, while the third
approach uses the hydrological solution, and the fourth algorithm solves Muskingum approach
with seven parameters. All these approaches were run with the same input parameters, the results
were compared and tested with four Error Measurement Indices, Sum of Squared Deviations,
Error of Peak Discharge, Variance Index, and agreement index. Diyala River was selected for
this application. Dynamic wave method gave accurate results, followed by the characteristic
method, and then the linear Muskingum-Cunge method, but Symbiotic Organisms Search
Algorithm not gave any senses due to change in roughness or bed slope and gave very identical
values with recorded outflow in all conditions, which means that the hydraulic solution is better
compared to the hydrological solution. The results also showed that the difference between the
calculated and observed flows diminished with a decrease in the coefficient of friction and an
increase in the bed slope channel.
-
سنة النشر : 2022
-
تصنيف البحث : scopus
- تحميل